Em Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 02:29:18PM +0000, Reshetova, Elena escreveu: > > Em Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 05:34:55PM +0200, Elena Reshetova escreveu: > > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > > > situations. > > > #define __CGROUP_H__ > > > > > > -#include <linux/atomic.h> > > > +#include <linux/refcount.h> > > > > So this is the first one, I was expecting the copy from > > include/linux/refcount.h to be made to tools/include/linux/refcount.h, > > as was done for tools/include/linux/atomic.h and all the other stuff in > > tools/include/ > > > > See: > > > > commit c4b6014e8bb0c8d47fe5c71ebc604f31091e5d3f > > Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com> > > Date: Mon Jul 11 10:28:48 2016 -0300 > > > > tools: Add copy of perf_event.h to tools/include/linux/ > > > > -------------- > > > > For one of the reasons we've been doing this. > Hm.. I have taken a look on it and I am confused. refcount.h is not > exactly standalone header and seems to bring in quite some many > dependencies to other headers (linux/bug.h, linux/mutex.h etc.), which > are not present in tools headers dirs.
> I tried to compile perf tool as a start, copied the refcount.h to > tools/include/linux/ and somewhere after it wanted me to bring the > 10th header I stopped, because this cannot be right, or? So, it doesn't have to be a straight copy, and it just shows the problem with using the kernel headers directly, i.e. tools/perf/ uses atomic.h, and uses that for refcounting, but not all of include/linux/refcount.h should be copied to tools/include/linux/refcount.h. I'll try doing the work, that way I'll read about this new stuff, will come back here with what I find, so you can continue on the kernel bits for now, ok? - Arnaldo