On 02/22, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > note also that PTRACE_LISTEN itself can do ptrace_signal_wake_up(true),
please ignore, in this case the __TASK_TRACED at the start of _unfreeze() saves us. > > > This causes it to instead clobber TASK_WAKING, > > even if it is already TASK_RUNNING it is simply wrong to set TASK_TRACED > in both cases, right? > > Thanks. The patch looks good at first glance, but let me think a bit... > perhaps we should change PTRACE_LISTEN instead, not sure. > > Oleg.
