On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:16:57PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> [...] And then it sounds pretty much like what the allocator/direct
> reclaim already does.

On a side note: Michal, I'm not sure I fully understand why we need
the backoff code in should_reclaim_retry(). If no_progress_loops is
growing steadily, then we quickly reach 16 and bail anyway. Layering
on top a backoff function that *might* cut out an iteration or two
earlier in the cold path of an OOM situation seems unnecessary.
Conversely, if there *are* intermittent reclaims, no_progress_loops
gets reset straight to 0, which then also makes the backoff function
jump back to square one. So in the only situation where backing off
would make sense - making some progress, but not enough - it's not
actually backing off. It seems to me it should be enough to bail after
either 16 iterations or when free + reclaimable < watermark.

Hm?

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index c470b8fe28cf..b0e9495c0530 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3396,11 +3396,10 @@ bool gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(gfp_t gfp_mask)
 /*
  * Checks whether it makes sense to retry the reclaim to make a forward 
progress
  * for the given allocation request.
- * The reclaim feedback represented by did_some_progress (any progress during
- * the last reclaim round) and no_progress_loops (number of reclaim rounds 
without
- * any progress in a row) is considered as well as the reclaimable pages on the
- * applicable zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of
- * no_progress_loops).
+ *
+ * We give up when we either have tried MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES in a row
+ * without success, or when we couldn't even meet the watermark if we
+ * reclaimed all remaining pages on the LRU lists.
  *
  * Returns true if a retry is viable or false to enter the oom path.
  */
@@ -3441,13 +3440,11 @@ should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned order,
                unsigned long reclaimable;
 
                available = reclaimable = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
-               available -= DIV_ROUND_UP((*no_progress_loops) * available,
-                                         MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES);
                available += zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
 
                /*
-                * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole
-                * available?
+                * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed all
+                * the reclaimable pages?
                 */
                if (__zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, min_wmark_pages(zone),
                                ac_classzone_idx(ac), alloc_flags, available)) {

Reply via email to