On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:34:35PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Linux Kernel Mailing List > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Web: > > > https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/edee4f1e92458299505ff007733f676b00c516a1 > > > Commit: edee4f1e92458299505ff007733f676b00c516a1 > > > Parent: 5c178d81b69f08ca3195427a6ea9a46d9af23127 > > > Refname: refs/heads/master > > > Author: Florian Westphal <[email protected]> > > > AuthorDate: Fri Feb 3 13:35:50 2017 +0100 > > > Committer: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]> > > > CommitDate: Wed Feb 8 14:16:23 2017 +0100 > > > > > Unlike for the other cases of the switch statement, "len" is not initialized > > here... > > > > > + break; > > > priv->sreg = nft_parse_register(tb[NFTA_CT_SREG]); > > > err = nft_validate_register_load(priv->sreg, len); > > > > ... and used here, which may lead to spurious failures of > > nft_validate_register_load(). > > Yes, Dan reported this and a patch is queued at > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/727573/ > > Pablo, any reason why this is still waiting?
I just flushing out my nf.git tree via pull request. Once these changes are pulled, I'll fetch recent net-next changes that were just merged via net. Then, I'll pick this so we can calm down these compilation warnings. Are you OK with this procedure? Thanks!
