Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni > <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com> wrote: >> On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
<snipp> >> A few weeks ago, I was telling Boris to let it not build for a while and >> then remove it. You already went out of your way to make it work. Again, >> feel free to send a patch removing avr32. I can only see a lot of >> benefits for the Atmel ARM SoCs and the many cleanups that will follow. > > Agree, I can't help but feel that the AVR32 support is doing more harm > than good at this point. I also agree on this, I can relate to Nicolas (and Atmel friends) having to always think about the less-maintained AVR32 parts when improving drivers. >> If nobody complains about the 4.10 breakage, You'll have plenty of time >> to remove it for 4.12 > > I'm fine with that, but I haven't put much effort into keeping it > alive lately. If Hans-Christian agrees, I'm willing to post a patch to > remove it, or ack someone else's patch. Then lets plan this for 4.12, either you Håvard whip up a patch or I can eventually do it. I can push it through the linux-avr32 git tree on kernel.org. -- mvh Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
