On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 07:39:22PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > I think therefore that tpmns<n> for TPM Namespace would be very > > appropriate. > > Makes sense. We can go with tpmns.
When we have talked about TPM namespaces in the past it has been around the idea of restricting which TPMs the namespace has access too and changing the 'kernel tpm' for that namespace. Jason
