On 26/02/2017 at 13:50:56 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > [ + Alexandre Belloni for the at91 issue ] > > kernelci.org bot <[email protected]> writes: > > > stable-rc boot: 211 boots: 1 failed, 201 passed with 9 offline > > (v4.9.12-33-g0417d46eeb59) > > > > Full Boot Summary: > > https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.9.12-33-g0417d46eeb59/ > > Full Build Summary: > > https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.9.12-33-g0417d46eeb59/ > > > > Tree: stable-rc > > Branch: local/linux-4.9.y > > Git Describe: v4.9.12-33-g0417d46eeb59 > > Git Commit: 0417d46eeb59b912a361bd35e1da2c2488f0d7c9 > > Git URL: > > http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > Tested: 54 unique boards, 17 SoC families, 27 builds out of 206 > > > > Boot Failure Detected: > > > > arm: > > > > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y > > at91-sama5d2_xplained: 1 failed lab > > > > I'm guessing this is the same problem we've seen on other at91 platforms > with UART overruns when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled. > > If so, it's a known issue with a patch for mainline proposed, but not > sure about the status of the stable backports. Alexandre? >
It landed in Linus' tree on Friday and is properly marked for stable so it is a matter of time until it is picked up by the stable maintainers. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
