Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org> writes: > Hi Ying, > > On 21 February 2017 at 03:40, Huang, Ying <ying.hu...@intel.com> wrote: >> Hi, Vincent, >> >> Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org> writes: >> > > [snip] > >>>> >>>> Here is the test result, >>>> >>>> ========================================================================================= >>>> compiler/cpufreq_governor/freq/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/samples/tbox_group/test/testcase: >>>> >>>> gcc-6/powersave/20/x86_64-rhel-7.2/100%/debian-x86_64-2016-08-31.cgz/6000ss/lkp-hsw-d01/cache/ftq >>>> >>>> commit: >>>> 4e5160766fcc9f41bbd38bac11f92dce993644aa: first bad commit >>>> 09a43ace1f986b003c118fdf6ddf1fd685692d49: parent of first bad commit >>>> b524060933c546fd2410c5a09360ba23a0fef846: with fix patch above >>>> >>>> 4e5160766fcc9f41 09a43ace1f986b003c118fdf6d b524060933c546fd2410c5a093 >>>> ---------------- -------------------------- -------------------------- >>>> %stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev >>>> \ | \ | \ >>>> 3463 ± 10% -61.4% 1335 ± 17% -3.0% 3359 ± 2% >>>> ftq.noise.50% >>>> 1116 ± 23% -73.7% 293.90 ± 30% -23.8% 850.69 ± 17% >>>> ftq.noise.75% >>> >>> To be honest, I was expecting at least the same level of improvement >>> as the previous patch if not better but i was not expecting worse >>> results >> >> What's your next plan for this regression? At least your previous patch >> could recover part of it. > > I haven't been able to find better fix than the previous patch so i'm > going to send a clean version with proper commit message
Great to know this. Could you keep me posted? Best Regards, Huang, Ying > Regards, > Vincent > >> >> Best Regards, >> Huang, Ying
