Hi, everyone

Looking for some comment on these two patches :-)

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:59:21AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>According to commit <b115423357e0> ('mm/memblock: switch to use
>NUMA_NO_NODE instead of MAX_NUMNODES'), MAX_NUMNODES is not preferred as an
>node_id indicator.
>
>This patch use NUMA_NO_NODE as the default node_id for memblock.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@gmail.com>
>---
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 6 +++---
> mm/memblock.c      | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
>index 3f35b48d1d9d..4366242356c5 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
>@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void)
>        *   reserve specific pages for Sandy Bridge graphics. ]
>        */
>       for_each_memblock(reserved, mb_region) {
>-              if (mb_region->nid != MAX_NUMNODES)
>+              if (mb_region->nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
>                       node_set(mb_region->nid, reserved_nodemask);
>       }
> 
>@@ -633,9 +633,9 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
>       nodes_clear(node_online_map);
>       memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo));
>       WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, &memblock.memory,
>-                                MAX_NUMNODES));
>+                                NUMA_NO_NODE));
>       WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, &memblock.reserved,
>-                                MAX_NUMNODES));
>+                                NUMA_NO_NODE));
>       /* In case that parsing SRAT failed. */
>       WARN_ON(memblock_clear_hotplug(0, ULLONG_MAX));
>       numa_reset_distance();
>diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
>index d0f2c9632187..7d27566cee11 100644
>--- a/mm/memblock.c
>+++ b/mm/memblock.c
>@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct 
>memblock_type *type, u
>               type->regions[0].base = 0;
>               type->regions[0].size = 0;
>               type->regions[0].flags = 0;
>-              memblock_set_region_node(&type->regions[0], MAX_NUMNODES);
>+              memblock_set_region_node(&type->regions[0], NUMA_NO_NODE);
>       }
> }
> 
>@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, 
>phys_addr_t size)
>                    (unsigned long long)base + size - 1,
>                    0UL, (void *)_RET_IP_);
> 
>-      return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 
>0);
>+      return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, NUMA_NO_NODE, 
>0);
> }
> 
> /**
>@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, 
>phys_addr_t size)
>                    (unsigned long long)base + size - 1,
>                    0UL, (void *)_RET_IP_);
> 
>-      return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 
>0);
>+      return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, NUMA_NO_NODE, 
>0);
> }
> 
> /**
>@@ -1684,7 +1684,7 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_dump(struct 
>memblock_type *type, char *name
>               size = rgn->size;
>               flags = rgn->flags;
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
>-              if (memblock_get_region_node(rgn) != MAX_NUMNODES)
>+              if (memblock_get_region_node(rgn) != NUMA_NO_NODE)
>                       snprintf(nid_buf, sizeof(nid_buf), " on node %d",
>                                memblock_get_region_node(rgn));
> #endif
>-- 
>2.11.0

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to