On 28 February 2017 at 21:46, Jon Mason <jon.ma...@broadcom.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 28 February 2017 at 21:31, Jon Mason <jon.ma...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>> @@ -70,10 +70,19 @@
>>> clocks = <&periph_clk>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> - local-timer@20600 {
>>> + timer@20600 {
>>
>> Is there a reason for this rename? I don't really have preference for
>> any name, it's just we shouldn't keep renaming this depending of
>> personal preferences.
>>
>> It also doesn't seem like adjusting to any schema:
>> bcm63138.dtsi uses local-timer@1e600
>> bcm-nsp.dtsi uses twd-timer@20600
>> berlin2cd.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
>> berlin2.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
>> berlin2q.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
>
> This was a suggestion from Sergei Shtylyov
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-December/395160.html
Good to know, thanks!
--
Rafał
