On 03/19, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> +static void signalfd_unlock(struct signalfd_ctx *ctx,
> + struct signalfd_lockctx *lk)
> +{
> + unlock_task_sighand(lk->tsk, &lk->flags);
> +}
Again, this is a matter of taste. But I can't understand why signalfd_unlock()
needs "signalfd_ctx *ctx" parameter. If we have "struct signalfd_lockctx *lk",
signalfd_lock() can setup lk->ctx if it is ever needed.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
