On 2017/03/06 06:38PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:37:20PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > > On 2017/02/08 01:24AM, Naveen N Rao wrote: > > > ... as the weak variant will do. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c | 10 ---------- > > > arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 6 ------ > > > 2 files changed, 16 deletions(-) > > > > With the generic changes in this series now in -rc1, can you please pick > > this up? > > It would've been nice to have been in the To: or Cc: on this patch, > I suspect everyone on the ARM side ignored this series (I certainly > didn't notice it, and I suspect the ARM64 folk didn't notice it for > exactly the same reason.) > > In any case, this patch needs to be split - ARM and ARM64 are > maintained separately (as stated in MAINTAINERS), and patches go via > different trees. Please resubmit with the patch split between the > architectures and proper recipients in the headers.
Got it. Please find the updated patches in this thread. Thanks, Naveen