This converts from WARN() to CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION() (so that system
builders can choose between WARN and BUG). Additionally moves refcount_t
sanity-check conditionals into regular function flow.

Now when built with CONFIG_BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION, the LKDTM REFCOUNT_*
tests correctly kill offending processes.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
---
 lib/refcount.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/refcount.c b/lib/refcount.c
index 1d33366189d1..54aff1e0582f 100644
--- a/lib/refcount.c
+++ b/lib/refcount.c
@@ -37,6 +37,13 @@
 #include <linux/refcount.h>
 #include <linux/bug.h>
 
+/*
+ * CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION() is defined with __must_check, but we have a
+ * couple places where we want to report a condition that has already
+ * been checked, so this lets us cheat __must_check.
+ */
+#define REFCOUNT_CHECK(cond, str) unlikely(CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(cond, str))
+
 bool refcount_add_not_zero(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
 {
        unsigned int old, new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs);
@@ -58,7 +65,8 @@ bool refcount_add_not_zero(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
                val = old;
        }
 
-       WARN(new == UINT_MAX, "refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.\n");
+       REFCOUNT_CHECK(new == UINT_MAX,
+                       "refcount_t: add saturated; leaking memory.\n");
 
        return true;
 }
@@ -66,7 +74,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_add_not_zero);
 
 void refcount_add(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
 {
-       WARN(!refcount_add_not_zero(i, r), "refcount_t: addition on 0; 
use-after-free.\n");
+       REFCOUNT_CHECK(!refcount_add_not_zero(i, r),
+                       "refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\n");
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_add);
 
@@ -97,7 +106,8 @@ bool refcount_inc_not_zero(refcount_t *r)
                val = old;
        }
 
-       WARN(new == UINT_MAX, "refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.\n");
+       REFCOUNT_CHECK(new == UINT_MAX,
+                       "refcount_t: inc saturated; leaking memory.\n");
 
        return true;
 }
@@ -111,7 +121,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_inc_not_zero);
  */
 void refcount_inc(refcount_t *r)
 {
-       WARN(!refcount_inc_not_zero(r), "refcount_t: increment on 0; 
use-after-free.\n");
+       REFCOUNT_CHECK(!refcount_inc_not_zero(r),
+                       "refcount_t: increment on 0; use-after-free.\n");
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_inc);
 
@@ -124,10 +135,9 @@ bool refcount_sub_and_test(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
                        return false;
 
                new = val - i;
-               if (new > val) {
-                       WARN(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; 
use-after-free.\n");
+               if (REFCOUNT_CHECK(new > val,
+                               "refcount_t: sub underflow; use-after-free.\n"))
                        return false;
-               }
 
                old = atomic_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, val, new);
                if (old == val)
@@ -164,7 +174,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_dec_and_test);
 
 void refcount_dec(refcount_t *r)
 {
-       WARN(refcount_dec_and_test(r), "refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking 
memory.\n");
+       REFCOUNT_CHECK(refcount_dec_and_test(r),
+                       "refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.\n");
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_dec);
 
@@ -203,10 +214,9 @@ bool refcount_dec_not_one(refcount_t *r)
                        return false;
 
                new = val - 1;
-               if (new > val) {
-                       WARN(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; 
use-after-free.\n");
+               if (REFCOUNT_CHECK(new > val,
+                               "refcount_t: dec underflow; use-after-free.\n"))
                        return true;
-               }
 
                old = atomic_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, val, new);
                if (old == val)
@@ -264,4 +274,3 @@ bool refcount_dec_and_lock(refcount_t *r, spinlock_t *lock)
        return true;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_dec_and_lock);
-
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to