On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:11:40AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> The updated comments and other details are fine, but I'm not sure about the
> __va()
> change: the patch essentially open codes __va() in assembly - which would
> make any
> changes to __va() [for whatever reason] more difficult, right?
>
> Right now we don't seem to have a single such line of assembly, so changes to
> __va() can be done in C alone.
Ok, that's a fair point.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
