On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:00:27 -0500 Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2017-03-07 10:41, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 22:39:54 -0500 > > Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > >From the output I've seen, it doesn't look particularly useful, but it > > > > > > > was useful to finally see the source of those huge numbers of PATH > > > records. Here's an fpaste: > > > > > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/UpZoYuokojR0es1ayNdx5l5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE=/ > > > > > > > Those are the files for the module's trace events that are created. > > > > I'm still confused about what the issue is. > > The issue is the audit subsystem being overwhelmed by potentially > useless information. > > The initial report was "there's a bunch of null PATH records, please > make them go away", which was anywhere from 500 to 6000 records. I don't know the audit system and exactly what it is looking for. How does it deal with other virtual filesystems like procfs? Why is tracefs different? -- Steve
