On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 11:13:45AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > >Out of the box perhaps if it is the .tar.bz2 archive, but the same does not > >always hold for CVS repos, much less SVNs [random guess on svn]. He who > >pulls > >from a developer tree mostly knows to run 'autogen.sh' or 'autoreconf -fi' > >beforehand. > > You know what, you're right of course. Ok, I'm taking those back *out* > of the repo in the next update and then will have a script generate > these for the tarball. That does sound like the right thing.
Has a final decision about generated files been made? I don't see any updates in the git repo, and man pages are still broken (any attempt to regenerate them will cause changes to the generated files to be lost).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
