On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 12:34:07PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 03/07/2017 12:59 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:33:57AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >> I don't know anyone else who is working on this problem. Though I > >> have a vested interested in it as a glibc maintainer, since it would > >> be nice to avoid duplicate headers where possible between the kernel > >> and userspace. > > > > I've been working with the bionic developers to try to help clean up > > some of these things. Yes, epoll is messy here as you all have pointed > > out, and I'll be glad to review any patches that people submit for this. > > I need to get some spare time (hah!) to work through some of the issues > > that the bionic developers have already pointed out to me... > > Sounds awesome. Please keep linux-api in the loop so the other libc > maintainers can follow along. From a glibc perspective I'm interested, > but also busy (see the other thread about libc-compat.h which has > immediate impact on header coordination).
Ah, I forgot to cc: linux-api on my last epoll header file change, I'll go do that now before I commit it to my tree for 4.12... thanks, greg k-h
