David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > I guess this is fine, but I think you can use one of the two "sk_padding" > bits in struct sock instead of making the structure larger.
It shouldn't make the structure larger since there's a hole in the structure: unsigned int sk_padding : 2, sk_no_check_tx : 1, sk_no_check_rx : 1, sk_userlocks : 4, sk_protocol : 8, sk_type : 16; #define SK_PROTOCOL_MAX U8_MAX kmemcheck_bitfield_end(flags); u16 sk_gso_max_segs; ---> 2-byte hole here unsigned long sk_lingertime; but I'll quite happily shift it to sk_padding. Thanks, David