On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 10:12 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 08-03-17 10:54:57, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > In fact, false OOM kills with that kind of workload is
> > how we ended up getting the "too many isolated" logic
> > in the first place.
> Right, but the retry logic was considerably different than what we
> have these days. should_reclaim_retry considers amount of reclaimable
> memory. As I've said earlier if we see a report where the oom hits
> prematurely with many NR_ISOLATED* we know how to fix that.
Would it be enough to simply reset no_progress_loops
in this check inside should_reclaim_retry, if we know
pageout IO is pending?
if (!did_some_progress) {
unsigned long write_pending;
write_pending =
zone_page_state_snapshot(zone,
NR_ZONE_WRITE_P
ENDING);
if (2 * write_pending > reclaimable) {
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC,
HZ/10);
return true;
}
}
--
All rights reversed
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
