3.2.87-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ilya Dryomov <idryo...@gmail.com>

commit 5c056fdc5b474329037f2aa18401bd73033e0ce0 upstream.

After sending an authorizer (ceph_x_authorize_a + ceph_x_authorize_b),
the client gets back a ceph_x_authorize_reply, which it is supposed to
verify to ensure the authenticity and protect against replay attacks.
The code for doing this is there (ceph_x_verify_authorizer_reply(),
ceph_auth_verify_authorizer_reply() + plumbing), but it is never
invoked by the the messenger.

AFAICT this goes back to 2009, when ceph authentication protocols
support was added to the kernel client in 4e7a5dcd1bba ("ceph:
negotiate authentication protocol; implement AUTH_NONE protocol").

The second param of ceph_connection_operations::verify_authorizer_reply
is unused all the way down.  Pass 0 to facilitate backporting, and kill
it in the next commit.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryo...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <s...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 net/ceph/messenger.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

--- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
@@ -1350,6 +1350,19 @@ static int process_connect(struct ceph_c
 
        dout("process_connect on %p tag %d\n", con, (int)con->in_tag);
 
+       if (con->auth_reply_buf) {
+               /*
+                * Any connection that defines ->get_authorizer()
+                * should also define ->verify_authorizer_reply().
+                * See get_connect_authorizer().
+                */
+               ret = con->ops->verify_authorizer_reply(con, 0);
+               if (ret < 0) {
+                       con->error_msg = "bad authorize reply";
+                       return ret;
+               }
+       }
+
        switch (con->in_reply.tag) {
        case CEPH_MSGR_TAG_FEATURES:
                pr_err("%s%lld %s feature set mismatch,"

Reply via email to