Em Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:37:38PM +1100, Michael Ellerman escreveu: > "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > > On 2017/03/08 11:29AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >> > I wasn't sure if you were planning on picking up KPROBES_ON_FTRACE for > >> > v4.11. If so, it would be good to take this patch through the powerpc > >> > tree. Otherwise, this can go via Ingo's tree. > >> > >> If you guys convince Ingo that this should go _now_, then just cherry > >> pick what was merged into tip/perf/core that is needed for the arch > >> specific stuff and go from there. > > > > Ok, in hindsight, I think Michael's concern was actually for v4.12 > > Yes I was talking about 4.12, sorry I thought that was implied :) > > > itself, in which case this particular patch can go via powerpc tree, > > while the rest of the patches in this series can go via your tree. > > > > Michael? > > Yeah I think that's the easiest option. The function will be temporarily > unused until the two trees are merged, but I think that's fine.
Ok, done that, now compile testing building it in my multi-distro/x-build containers. - Arnaldo
