On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 10:54 +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Add support to get a list of resets available for the device.
> These resets must be kept de-asserted until the device is
> in use.
> 
> Cc: Felipe Balbi <ba...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gau...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> 
> Based on torvald's master branch.
> 
>  drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c | 49 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c 
> b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
> index fe414e7a9c78..025de7342d28 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
> @@ -29,13 +29,52 @@
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
>  
>  struct dwc3_of_simple {
>       struct device           *dev;
>       struct clk              **clks;
>       int                     num_clocks;
> +     struct reset_control    **resets;
> +     int                     num_resets;
>  };
>  
> +static int dwc3_of_simple_reset_init(struct dwc3_of_simple *simple, int 
> count)
> +{
> +     struct device           *dev = simple->dev;
> +     int                     i;
> +
> +     simple->num_resets = count;
> +
> +     if (!count)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     simple->resets = devm_kcalloc(dev, simple->num_resets,
> +                             sizeof(struct reset_control *), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!simple->resets)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < simple->num_resets; i++) {
> +             struct reset_control *reset;
> +             int ret;
> +
> +             reset = devm_reset_control_get_by_index(dev, i);

Please use devm_reset_control_get_exclusive_by_index instead. See
include/linux/reset.h for details.

> +             if (IS_ERR(reset))
> +                     return PTR_ERR(reset);
> +
> +             simple->resets[i] = reset;
> +
> +             ret = reset_control_deassert(reset);
> +             if (ret) {
> +                     while (--i >= 0)
> +                             reset_control_assert(reset);
> +                     return ret;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}

This looks rather generic. Should we have a
reset_control_get/assert/deassert_array functionality at the reset API
level?

>  static int dwc3_of_simple_clk_init(struct dwc3_of_simple *simple, int count)
>  {
>       struct device           *dev = simple->dev;
> @@ -100,6 +139,10 @@ static int dwc3_of_simple_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       if (ret)
>               return ret;
>  
> +     ret = dwc3_of_simple_reset_init(simple, of_reset_control_get_count(np));
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
> +

Not a blocker, but it seems a bit inconsistent to count the reset
controls via the device node (of_...), but then get them via the device
(devm_reset_control_get_... instead of of_reset_control_get_...).

regards
Philipp

Reply via email to