On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:00:20AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:26:17PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows > readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what > you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the > discussion is being addressed. > > > In this series, you applied patch 2 and 3 but not patch 1. > > (so the dioo prefix is used but not documented) > > > Is it on purpose ? > > The patch does not have the "ASoC" prefix, this maybe why it was > > missed. Since, the file does no belong to alsa, I wasn't sure whether > > to put the prefix or not. > > This is a generic DT patch, not part of the bindings, so I'd expect the > DT maintainers to take it.
I usually don't if it's part of a series, but I have applied it. Rob
