Em Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:17:04PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:03:38PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:39:36PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann escreveu: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 02:44:45PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> It's probably another variation of this bug, but the commit you cite > > > >> got merged > > > >> into 4.10-rc1, while the problem still persists in mainline > > > >> (4.11-rc2+).
> > > > the problem is in objtool build right? the fix was for perf build > > > Ah, got it. Yes, that must be it then. I supposed we coul duplicate what > > > you > > > did for perf in objtool, but a cleaner way would be to generalize it for > > > all of > > > tools/, right? > right, the thing is that objtool is standalone application like perf, > and before their builds can go the 'fixdep' needs to be there.. that's > a condition to use the tools/build framework > not sure how offensive it'd be to current Makefiles if we come with some > generalized code to do that.. I'll think about it, but I think we might > be better of the way we are now > > Humm, can't we have just one fixdep? > we have.. it's just the matter who will build it first ;-) Ok, I haven't said "can't we have just one fixdep?", what I really said was "can't we make sure we don't have races building it?" ;-) - Arnaldo
