On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 12:56 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > fs/proc/inode.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > --- a/fs/proc/inode.c > +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c > @@ -167,8 +167,9 @@ static loff_t proc_reg_llseek(struct fil > llseek = pde->proc_fops->llseek; > spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock); > > - if (llseek) > - rv = llseek(file, offset, whence); > + if (!llseek) > + llseek = default_llseek; > + rv = llseek(file, offset, whence); >
this has potential impact way outside kcore...... did you audit all proc users to see if they can deal with lseek? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
