On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 19:40 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >> What I probably can do is go through and replace all the spots where >> we where checking for sk_napi_id being 0, and instead replace it with >> a check against NR_CPUS. > > This seems a good idea.
Right. This is the path I am planning to go with. It will require about the same amount of code change but replaces those checks. I just have to make sure I catch all the spots where we were checking it for 0 but that shouldn't be too difficult of an issue.
