On Tue 2017-02-28 16:28:11, Natale Patriciello wrote: > It seems there is no interest in fixing bugs (such as [1]). Moreover, > same guest filesystem (same host os, distribution, etc.) on two > different machines (i7-2630 the first, i7-7700HQ the second) yield > different results, with crashes and corruption of filesystem in the > modern computer. So, can I consider UML as a legacy thing in the Linux > kernel? With what I can replace it (I'm doing TCP research, and I focus > on the networking stack)?
Well.. if it worked before and does not work now, that's a regression
and will be fixed. Bisect would be useful.
If it never worked on new CPUs, that's different situation...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
