Hi! > > > Hah! That's the joy of being a maintainer of a driver in staging. Even > > > if you filter out outreachy, you are going to get a lot of "basic > > > mistakes" and other type patches cc:ed to you. > > > > > > I strongly suggest, that if you all don't like this type of stuff, > > > either: > > > - work to get the code out of staging as soon as possible (i.e. > > > send me coding style fixes for everything right now, and then > > > fix up the rest of the stuff.) > > > - take yourself off the maintainer list for this code. > > > > > > It's your choice, outreachy right now is a lot of patches, but again, > > > it's not going to keep you from getting the "basic" stuff sent to you > > > in ways that is totally wrong. > > > > Could we get these trivial patches off the lkml? Yes, lkml already has > > a lot of traffic, but no, this is not useful :-(. > > The outreachy instructions say to use the -nol argument to > get_maintainers, which would prevent them from being sent to any mailing > list. However others thought that all patches should be sent to mailing > lists, and so I haven't enforced anything for people who have omitted > -nol. However I have tried to remove bcm maintainers from CC lists on > replies and reminded people not to send you patches,
Wonderful :-(.
Can we at least make those people put the word "outreachy" in the
subject so the emails are easier to delete?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
