Hello Alexis and Arnaldo,

I think this series is now good to go.
Could you pick these? 

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>

for this series.

Thank you,

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 01:07:30 +0100
Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlem...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Masami,
> 
> Many thanks for your mail.
> 
> Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned:
> 
> * Skip the arguments containing a constant ($123); 
> * Review the code in charge of the register renaming (search for '%'
>   and parse it);
> * Minor changes (print the argument in case of error, skipping, check
>   the sdt arg type index);
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Alexis.
> 
> Alexis Berlemont (2):
>   perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments
>   perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string
> 
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c |  83 +++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c          |   6 ++
>  tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h          |   6 ++
>  tools/perf/util/probe-file.c         | 170 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c         |  25 +++++-
>  tools/perf/util/symbol.h             |   1 +
>  6 files changed, 285 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.10.2
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>

Reply via email to