On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:37:59 -0500
Julia Cartwright <ju...@ni.com> wrote:
> Which kernel were you testing on, here? From what I can tell, this
> should have been fixed with Thomas's commit:
>
> 2a1d3ab8986d ("genirq: Handle force threading of irqs with primary
> and thread handler")
Thanks Julia for looking into this. I just looked at the code, and saw
that it does very little with the lock held, and was fine with the
conversion. But if that interrupt handler should be in a thread, we
should see if that's the issue first.
>
> Which landed in 4.4. It forces the primary handler to be threaded as
> well.
>
Lionel,
Can you check if this is an issue with 4.4 too?
-- Steve
