On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:06:59PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > On 03/23/2017 03:41 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Rather than trying to pick an arbitrarily large number, how about we use > > separate flags to determine whether we're in multi-shot mode, and > > whether a (oneshot) report has been made. > > > > How about the below? > > Yes, it deferentially looks better. > Can you send a patch with a changelog, or do you want me to care of it? Would you be happy to take care of it, along with the fixup you suggested below, as v3? You can add my: Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> Thanks, Mark. > > > > +#include <linux/bitops.h> > > #include <linux/ftrace.h> > > We also need <linux/init.h> for __setup(). > > > #include <linux/kernel.h> > > #include <linux/mm.h> > > @@ -293,6 +294,40 @@ static void kasan_report_error(struct > > kasan_access_info *info)
