From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PATCH] utsns: fix !CONFIG_UTS_NS behavior
When CONFIG_UTS_NS=n, clone(CLONE_NEWUTS) quietly refuses. So correctly does
not unshare a new uts namespace, but also does not return -EINVAL.
Fix this to return -EINVAL so the caller knows his request was denied.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/utsname.h | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
bc350994ac67df8f1b917f9979c065d87757eabe
diff --git a/include/linux/utsname.h b/include/linux/utsname.h
index a4555fe..e10267d 100644
--- a/include/linux/utsname.h
+++ b/include/linux/utsname.h
@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ static inline int unshare_utsname(unsign
static inline int copy_utsname(int flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
+ if (flags & CLONE_NEWUTS)
+ return -EINVAL;
return 0;
}
static inline void put_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *ns)
--
1.1.6
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
