On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Jessica Yu <j...@redhat.com> wrote: > +++ Kees Cook [23/03/17 14:13 -0700]: >> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Eddie Kovsky <e...@edkovsky.org> wrote: >>> >>> Implement a mechanism to check if a module's address is in >>> the rodata or ro_after_init sections. It mimics the exsiting functions >>> that test if an address is inside a module's text section. >>> >>> Functions that take a module as an argument will be able to >>> verify that the module is in a read-only section. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Eddie Kovsky <e...@edkovsky.org> >> >> >> Awesome! I'll be glad to have these. >> >> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> >> >> Jessica, if this looks good to you, should this go via modules or via >> my tree? If mine, can I have your Ack? > > > Sure, would be happy to let you take this patch through your tree. I > only had a few minor comments left, so I think just one more small > respin and it'll be good to go.
Awesome, I'll wait for v4 and your Ack and put it through the kspp tree. :) Thanks for the review! -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
