On Sun, 2017-03-26 at 12:26 +0100, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:07:35AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > 4.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let
> > me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Zhang Rui <rui.zh...@intel.com>
> >
> > commit e28d6f048799acb0014491e6b74e580d84bd7916 upstream.
> >
> > With commit 67bf5156edc4 ("gpio / ACPI: fix returned error from
> > acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get()"), mmc_gpiod_request_cd() returns
> > -EPROBE_DEFER if
> > GPIO is not ready when sdhci-acpi driver is probed, and sdhci-acpi
> > driver
> > should be probed again later in this case.
> >
> > This fixes an order issue when both GPIO and sdhci-acpi drivers are
> > built
> > as modules.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177101
> > Tested-by: Jonas Aaberg <c...@gmx.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zh...@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > @@ -467,7 +467,10 @@ static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platf
> > if (sdhci_acpi_flag(c, SDHCI_ACPI_SD_CD)) {
> > bool v = sdhci_acpi_flag(c,
> > SDHCI_ACPI_SD_CD_OVERRIDE_LEVEL);
> >
> > - if (mmc_gpiod_request_cd(host->mmc, NULL, 0, v, 0,
> > NULL)) {
> > + err = mmc_gpiod_request_cd(host->mmc, NULL, 0, v,
> > 0, NULL);
> > + if (err) {
> > + if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + goto err_free;
> > dev_warn(dev, "failed to setup card detect
> > gpio\n");
> > c->use_runtime_pm = false;
> > }
> >
> >
> Regression reported: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1948
> 71
>
> Reverting this patch is said to fix the issue for 4.10.2.
thanks for raising the issue. Let's see check why it breaks in the
bugzilla report.
thanks,
rui
