4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Sumit Semwal <[email protected]> From: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> [ Upstream commit 45d004f4afefdd8d79916ee6d97a9ecd94bb1ffe ] The BAR property bits (0-3 for memory BARs, 0-1 for I/O BARs) are supposed to be read-only, but we do save them in res->flags and include them when updating the BAR. Mask the I/O property bits with ~PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK (0x3) instead of PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK (0xf) to make it obvious that we can't corrupt bits 2-3 of I/O addresses. Use PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK for ROM BARs. This means we'll only check the top 21 bits (instead of the 28 bits we used to check) of a ROM BAR to see if the update was successful. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- drivers/pci/setup-res.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c @@ -58,12 +58,17 @@ static void pci_std_update_resource(stru return; pcibios_resource_to_bus(dev->bus, ®ion, res); + new = region.start; - new = region.start | (res->flags & PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK); - if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) + if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) { mask = (u32)PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK; - else + new |= res->flags & ~PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK; + } else if (resno == PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) { + mask = (u32)PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK; + } else { mask = (u32)PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK; + new |= res->flags & ~PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK; + } if (resno < PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) { reg = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + 4 * resno;
