On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 13:21 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should > immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to > parsing > unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block.
+Cc: Hans. Hans, do have any objections on this? Would you ideally give your Tested-by? > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > index a3faefa44f68..d3f9f028a37b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > @@ -572,8 +572,10 @@ struct gpio_desc *acpi_find_gpio(struct device > *dev, > } > > desc = acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(adev, propname, idx, > &info); > - if (!IS_ERR(desc) || (PTR_ERR(desc) == > -EPROBE_DEFER)) > + if (!IS_ERR(desc)) > break; > + if (PTR_ERR(desc) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > + return ERR_CAST(desc); > } > > /* Then from plain _CRS GPIOs */ > -- > 2.12.1.500.gab5fba24ee-goog > > -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy
