On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 11:01 +0200, Willy TARREAU wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:26:07AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Willy TARREAU <[email protected]
> > m> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 04:19:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 15:19 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:

> In fact here the output signals should be seen as a shared bus with
> multiple
> chip select signals. Note that in some designs it's even possible that
> pressing
> multiple buttons will cause crap to be sent to the LCD by short-
> circuiting
> the lines (if no diodes are used) but it might be acceptable for many
> designs,
> especially the DIY field where the principle is "don't do it".

So, summarizing the comments are we okay to proceed or there is a clear
objection?

P.S. Note, that there is at least one driver under drivers/auxdisplay
which supports key buttons.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Intel Finland Oy

Reply via email to