On Mon, 26 March 2007 13:49:06 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:08 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote: > > > > Logical volume management can just as easily move its management > > information into a table, instead of having it spread across all blocks. > > Blocks can keep their original size. Since you have to scan flash > > anyway, you can also scan for a table, compare a magical number and do > > some extra check to protect yourself against a UBI image inside some > > logical volume. No big deal. > > First off, I see these no big deal statements for years already, and no > decent implementation proved by usage in real world. Could we please, > move these academic discussions to another thread?
You could wait a day, then reread what I wrote. Maybe you will notice that what I wrote is not identical to what we have discussed about a year ago and you seem to have read. You may also want to reread this: ||[ This was not a request for UBI to be changed. The only purpose was to ||illustrate that LogFS is not broken. The previous thread suggested ||otherwise and I just couldn't leave it at that. ] Jörn -- tglx1 thinks that joern should get a (TM) for "Thinking Is Hard" -- Thomas Gleixner - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/