On Tuesday 27 March 2007 01:28, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Subsequent to that Con suggested testing a refactored RSDL patch. That > patch seemed to work on the machine at hand, so tests have been > submitted for all the affected machines. > > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.21-rc4-mm1-rsdl-0.34-t >est.patch > > ... > > Ok, the preliminary results are in and we seem to have good boots in the > three machines I was hitting early boot oops. So I think we can say > that the new stack is a lot better than the old. > > Con, have a Tested-by: > :/ > > -apw
Well thank you very much indeed. I'm pleased that the code I decided to rip out of the next update also took whatever bug was there with it. Fortunately it also is not dependant on the buggy sched: accurate user accounting patch that I gave up on so here is an incremental from the current -mm queue to this code without the "accurate user accounting patch" component for anyone who's trying to track just what I'm planning on moving forward with. http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/sched-rsdl-sd-0.35-test.patch Summary: 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 249 deletions(-) It also makes lists-add_list_splice_tail.patch unnecessary -- -ck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
