3.16.43-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
commit c7757074839f2cd440521482d76ea180d0d4bdac upstream.
The brand new GCC 5.1.0 warns by default on using a boolean in the
switch condition. This results in the following warning:
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c: In function 'nfs4_proc_get_rootfh':
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:3100:10: warning: switch condition has boolean value
[-Wswitch-bool]
switch (auth_probe) {
^
This code was obviously using switch to make use of the fall-through
semantics (without the usual comment, though).
Rewrite that code using if statements to avoid the warning and make
the code a bit more readable on the way.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -3000,16 +3000,13 @@ int nfs4_proc_get_rootfh(struct nfs_serv
struct nfs_fsinfo *info,
bool auth_probe)
{
- int status;
+ int status = 0;
- switch (auth_probe) {
- case false:
+ if (!auth_probe)
status = nfs4_lookup_root(server, fhandle, info);
- if (status != -NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC)
- break;
- default:
+
+ if (auth_probe || status == NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC)
status = nfs4_do_find_root_sec(server, fhandle, info);
- }
if (status == 0)
status = nfs4_server_capabilities(server, fhandle);
