On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >You should really consider the latter for getting updates merged in the > > > >future > > > > > > we're planning for this, but the short term it isnt doable for us > > > > If you think mangling patches by hand is a more effective use of time, no > > one is stopping you -- some people even prefer that. On the other hand, if > > you're struggling with an effective methodology before things are merged, > > what reason is there to suspect that things will get better afterwards? > > we have a lot of infrastructure that the SCM is part of and at the > moment, git is not a supported SCM > > i'm not saying the current system is easy, just that we cant integrate > git in the short term, so we'll continue spanking Bryan with the > overhead :/
In that case, Bryan may like to know that git, mercurial (IIRC), and quilt have patchbomb tools. Also GregKH has one somewhere (he can tell you where). And Paul Jacksone has one at http://www.speakeasy.org/~pj99/sgi/sendpatchset --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
