On 04/04/2017 11:41 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 30-03-17 17:48:39, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabi...@virtuozzo.com>
>> Subject: mm/vmalloc: allow to call vfree() in atomic context fix
>>
>> Don't spawn worker if we already purging.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabi...@virtuozzo.com>
> I would rather put this into a separate patch. Ideally with some numners
> as this is an optimization...

Actually, this just mimics what the code was doing before, as it only
invoked
__purge_vmap_area_lazy() if the trylock succeeded.

/Thomas




>
>> ---
>>  mm/vmalloc.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
>> index ea1b4ab..88168b8 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
>> @@ -737,7 +737,8 @@ static void free_vmap_area_noflush(struct vmap_area *va)
>>      /* After this point, we may free va at any time */
>>      llist_add(&va->purge_list, &vmap_purge_list);
>>  
>> -    if (unlikely(nr_lazy > lazy_max_pages()))
>> +    if (unlikely(nr_lazy > lazy_max_pages()) &&
>> +        !mutex_is_locked(&vmap_purge_lock))
>>              schedule_work(&purge_vmap_work);
>>  }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.10.2
>>

Reply via email to