On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 01:34:42PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote: > I'd like to keep the functions separate since they're logically independent. > I can > define something like smca_configure() as a wrapper function that can contain > current and future SMCA related functions. Is this okay?
Are you planning to call the one and not the other in some path?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
