Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
---
kernel/softlockup.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ b/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(print_lock);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, touch_timestamp);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, print_timestamp);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long long, touch_timestamp);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long long, print_timestamp);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, watchdog_task);
static int did_panic = 0;
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static struct notifier_block panic_block
void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
{
- __raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = jiffies;
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = sched_clock();
}
I'd like to see this patch implement/fix touch_cpu_softlockup_watchdog
and touch_softlockup_watchdog to mimic touch_nmi_watchdog's behaviour.
See this now obsolete patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/15/131
P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
