On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 05:06:58PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:54:40PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > >> @@ -7324,8 +7324,9 @@ struct qib_devdata *qib_init_iba7322_funcs(struct > > >> pci_dev *pdev, > > >> actual_cnt -= dd->num_pports; > > >> > > >> tabsize = actual_cnt; > > >> - dd->cspec->msix_entries = kzalloc(tabsize * > > >> - sizeof(struct qib_msix_entry), GFP_KERNEL); > > >> + dd->cspec->msix_entries = kcalloc(tabsize, > > >> + > > >> sizeof(*dd->cspec->msix_entries), > > >> + GFP_KERNEL); > > > > > > Are we fine with loosing the zeroing of the entries? > > > > How did you get this concern? > > > > Do you really miss such functionality from the other interface? > > Ahm... Don't kzalloc() and kcalloc() both pass in __GFP_ZERO?
Yes. Please ignore my comment. > > -- > Johannes Thumshirn Storage > jthumsh...@suse.de +49 911 74053 689 > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
