Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Although it might be nice to do a printk before BUG'ing, it's really not
> necessary, and it complicates the code.
>

Acked-by: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
>  drivers/pci/msi.c |   19 ++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> Index: msi-new/drivers/pci/msi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- msi-new.orig/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ msi-new/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -646,18 +646,15 @@ void pci_disable_msi(struct pci_dev* dev
>       if (!entry || !entry->dev || entry->msi_attrib.type != PCI_CAP_ID_MSI) {
>               return;
>       }
> -     if (irq_has_action(dev->first_msi_irq)) {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "PCI: %s: pci_disable_msi() called without "
> -                    "free_irq() on MSI irq %d\n",
> -                    pci_name(dev), dev->first_msi_irq);
> -             BUG_ON(irq_has_action(dev->first_msi_irq));
> -     } else {
> -             default_irq = entry->msi_attrib.default_irq;
> -             msi_free_irq(dev, dev->first_msi_irq);
>  
> -             /* Restore dev->irq to its default pin-assertion irq */
> -             dev->irq = default_irq;
> -     }
> +     BUG_ON(irq_has_action(dev->first_msi_irq));
> +
> +     default_irq = entry->msi_attrib.default_irq;
> +     msi_free_irq(dev, dev->first_msi_irq);
> +
> +     /* Restore dev->irq to its default pin-assertion irq */
> +     dev->irq = default_irq;
> +
>       dev->first_msi_irq = 0;
>  }
>  
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to