Followup to:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:    Olivier Galibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> 
> What guarantees you that:
> 1- No device will respond 0xffff for an address it decodes
> 2- No device will crap up on you simply because you've read one
> particular address
> 
> If any of these if true for any device out there (I think I have one
> in my computer that does the 1/ part in some cases), your code is
> unsafe.
> 

It is.  There are plenty of devices for which an arbitrary IN is an
irrecoverable state transition.

        -hpa
-- 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to