On Fri,  7 Apr 2017 17:57:00 -0700
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.ker...@gmail.com> wrote:

> struct timespec is not y2038 safe on 32 bit machines
> and needs to be replaced by struct timespec64
> in order to represent times beyond year 2038 on such
> machines.
> 
> Fix all the timestamp representation in struct trace_hwlat
> and all the corresponding implementations.
> 

> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> index 02a4aeb..08f9bab 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
>   * Copyright (C) 2008 Red Hat Inc, Steven Rostedt <srost...@redhat.com>
>   *
>   */
> -
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> @@ -1161,11 +1160,11 @@ trace_hwlat_print(struct trace_iterator *iter, int 
> flags,
>  
>       trace_assign_type(field, entry);
>  
> -     trace_seq_printf(s, "#%-5u inner/outer(us): %4llu/%-5llu ts:%ld.%09ld",
> +     trace_seq_printf(s, "#%-5u inner/outer(us): %4llu/%-5llu ts:%lld.%09ld",
>                        field->seqnum,
>                        field->duration,
>                        field->outer_duration,
> -                      field->timestamp.tv_sec,
> +                      (long long)field->timestamp.tv_sec,

Refresh my memory. We need the cast because on 64 bit boxes
timestamp.tv_sec is just a long?

Other than that.

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rost...@goodmis.org>

-- Steve

>                        field->timestamp.tv_nsec);
>  
>       if (field->nmi_count) {
> @@ -1195,10 +1194,10 @@ trace_hwlat_raw(struct trace_iterator *iter, int 
> flags,
>  
>       trace_assign_type(field, iter->ent);
>  
> -     trace_seq_printf(s, "%llu %lld %ld %09ld %u\n",
> +     trace_seq_printf(s, "%llu %lld %lld %09ld %u\n",
>                        field->duration,
>                        field->outer_duration,
> -                      field->timestamp.tv_sec,
> +                      (long long)field->timestamp.tv_sec,
>                        field->timestamp.tv_nsec,
>                        field->seqnum);
>  

Reply via email to