4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> commit 693bdaa164b40b7aa6018b98af6f7e40dbd52457 upstream. If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to parsing unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]> Acked-and-Tested-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c @@ -571,8 +571,10 @@ struct gpio_desc *acpi_find_gpio(struct } desc = acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(adev, propname, idx, &info); - if (!IS_ERR(desc) || (PTR_ERR(desc) == -EPROBE_DEFER)) + if (!IS_ERR(desc)) break; + if (PTR_ERR(desc) == -EPROBE_DEFER) + return ERR_CAST(desc); } /* Then from plain _CRS GPIOs */
