On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 01:36:44PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> >>>>>> Here is PATCHv3 for the Nokia bluetooth patchset. I addressed all
> >>>>>> comments from
> >>>>>> Rob and Pavel regarding the serdev patches and dropped the *.dts
> >>>>>> patches, since
> >>>>>> they were queued by Tony. I also changed the patch order, so that the
> >>>>>> serdev
> >>>>>> patches come first. All of them have Acked-by from Rob, so I think it
> >>>>>> makes
> >>>>>> sense to merge them to serdev subsystem (now) and provide an immutable
> >>>>>> branch
> >>>>>> for the bluetooth subsystem.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Greg doesn't read cover letters generally and since the serdev patches
> >>>>> are Cc rather than To him, he's probably not planning to pick them up.
> >>>>
> >>>> I wonder actually if we should merge all of these via bluetooth-next
> >>>> tree with proper Ack from Greg. However it would be good to also get
> >>>> buy in from Dave for merging this ultimately through net-next.
> >>>
> >>> I don't really care where it goes. I can take the whole thing in my
> >>> tty/serial tree now if no one objects and I get an ack from the relevant
> >>> maintainers {hint...}
> >>
> >> I think it is better if it goes thru BT tree. I have another driver
> >> converted that is dependent on this series. There's a couple other
> >> serdev changes on the list too, but this shouldn't depend on them.
> >
> > Is this waiting for something, or could it be queued to
> > bluetooth-next then? It would be nice to finally have
> > this in 4.12 :)
>
> I would prefer if we can get an ACK from Greg. Then I merge it through the
> bluetooth-next tree.
Sorry thought this was coming through mine:
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Merge away!
greg k-h
